Go - Senior Backend Engineer, AI Coding Agent Quality @G2i

    7 days ago·G2i is hiring a remote Go - Senior Backend Engineer, AI Coding Agent Quality·📍 Remote

    SENIOR AI INTERACTION EVALUATOR (CODEX / CLAUDE CODE)

    Contract | $100–$200/hour | 10–20 hrs/week | Start ASAP (through early May)

    Check out this Loom video for more details! https://www.loom.com/share/b0d1b0bf24c44ae8b95dca84b9db60e5

    We’re looking for highly experienced software engineer (SR+) to help evaluate the quality of interactions with modern coding agents such as OpenAI Codex and Claude Code.

    This is not a traditional engineering role.

    You won’t be writing production code.
    You’ll be evaluating something harder: whether the model thinks like a great engineer.

    WHAT THIS ROLE ACTUALLY IS

    You will assess how AI coding agents behave in real-world scenarios — focusing on:

    - Whether the response makes sense

    - Whether the preamble and reasoning are useful

    - Whether the output reflects strong engineering judgment

    - Whether the interaction feels right to an experienced developer

    This role is about engineering taste — not syntax correctness.

    WHAT YOU’LL BE DOING

    - Evaluate AI-generated coding interactions end-to-end

    - Judge whether outputs are:

    - Useful

    - Correct (at a high level)

    - Aligned with how a strong engineer would think

    - Assess the quality of explanations and reasoning, not just code

    - Distinguish between different levels of response quality (e.g. what makes something a 2 vs 4)

    - Provide clear, opinionated feedback on:

    - What worked

    - What didn’t

    - What felt “off” or misleading

    - Help define what great looks like when interacting with tools like Cursor

    WHAT WE MEAN BY “TASTE”

    We’re specifically looking for engineers who can answer questions like:

    - Does this feel like something a strong engineer would actually say?

    - Is this explanation helpful, or just technically correct?

    - Is the model guiding the user well, or just dumping output?

    - Would this interaction build or erode trust?

    You should be comfortable making subjective but rigorous judgments.

    WHO YOU ARE

    - Staff / Principal-level engineer (or equivalent experience)

    - Strong background in one of the below:

    - TypeScript / JavaScript

    - Python

    - Hands-on experience using:

    - OpenAI Codex

    - Claude Code

    - Cursor

    - Deep familiarity with modern AI-assisted dev workflows

    - Able to evaluate code without needing to fully execute or deeply review every line

    - Comfortable giving direct, opinionated feedback

    - High bar for what “good engineering” looks like

    NICE TO HAVE

    - Experience with tools like Cursor or similar AI-first IDEs

    - Prior exposure to prompt design or evaluation workflows

    - Experience mentoring senior engineers or defining engineering standards

    ENGAGEMENT DETAILS

    - Rate: $100–$200/hour

    - Hours: ~10–20 hours/week

    - Duration: Through early May (with possible extension)

    - Start: ASAP

    - Process:

    - Take-home evaluation exercise

    - One behavioral interview

    Get jobs in your inbox

    Join over 10,000 subscribers receiving our weekly newsletter.